The impact of macroeconomic factors on agrifood trade in the post-soviet countries is in the focus of a new FAO study released here today.

Agrifood trade in the region proved to be highly sensitive to price shocks of any nature, especially currency exchange rate fluctuations and variability of global energy prices.

Macroeconomic instability and a complicated geopolitical situation – together with declining world oil prices – were found to have hampered agrifood trade and increased food prices in the concerned countries, the study found.

FAO analyzed the dynamics of imports and exports of agrifood products in 12 post-Soviet countries: Azerbaijan, Armenia, Belarus, Georgia, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Republic of Moldova, Russian Federation, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan and Ukraine. It also reviewed each country’s participation in trade agreements, and recorded changes in agricultural trade policy and agricultural support programmes.

A Review of Agrifood Trade Policies in the Post-Soviet Countries, 2015-2016, an annual report, is the result of work by the Agricultural Trade Expert Network of Europe and Central Asia, established in 2014 with support from FAO.

Slower economic growth in all countries of the region was accompanied by continued devaluation of national currencies vis-à-vis the US dollar and the Euro. Since a large share of the food in these countries is imported, food prices on internal markets rose, the study found.

Declining purchasing power and lower consumer demand for agrifood products in the region resulted in a decline in total value of both exports and imports in the region.

Changing geography of trade flows

“We also observed changes in the geography of trade flows in the region,” said Iryna Kobuta, FAO trade economist and one of the report’s editors. “Several post-Soviet countries saw a re-orientation of their agrifood exports to countries outside the region.”

“Several post-Soviet countries saw a re-orientation

of their agrifood exports to countries outside the region.”

 Irina Kobuta

FAO trade economist

A smaller share of exports went to the Russian Federation, and a larger share toward other countries of the world. For example, Russia’s share in the total value of agrifood exports from Armenia, Georgia and Moldova declined on average by 8 percentage points during 2015. At the same time, in Azerbaijan the share of export deliveries to Russian Federation increased by 13 percentage points, to 52 percent of the total.

An increase in the share of agrifood exports from Moldova to countries of the European Union was also observed – from 42 percent of the total in 2014 to 54 percent in 2015.

The region also experienced several trade bans, such a ban on the import of various categories of food products into the Russian Federation from Albania, Australia, Canada, the European Union, Iceland, Liechtenstein, Montenegro, Norway, Ukraine, and USA, which remained in effect during the period under study, and has since been extended to 31 December 2017.

Country highlights

The report includes 12 country chapters, with data on trade flows, import and export values, and more. Here are some highlights:

  • In all countries of the region except Tajikistan and Uzbekistan, 2015 saw a downward trend in the total value of agrifood exports and imports, with the sharpest declines in Kyrgyzstan, Georgia, Kazakhstan, Turkmenistan, and Belarus.
  • Tajikistan and Armenia are the two countries in the region where agrifood products account for the largest share of total value of imports.
  • In 2015, agrifood’s share of total export and import remained stable compared to 2014 for the bulk of the countries. The only exception was Ukraine, where agrifood’s share of total export grew by 7.3 percent, hitting 38 percent.
  • For Armenia, Georgia, Moldova and Uzbekistan, agrifood exports accounted for over 25 percent of total exports, while in Kazakhstan and Russian Federation the share was less than 5 percent.
  • Tajikistan is the only country in the region where 2015 saw growth of agricultural food exports compared to 2014 – from 192 to 204 million USD. This was largely due to growth in cotton exports.
  • In 2015 Ukraine, Uzbekistan, and Republic of Moldova were the only net exporters of agrifood products in the region.
  • In all other countries of the region in 2015, agrifood imports continued to exceed exports. However, the size of the agrifood trade deficit declined for most countries of the region.
  • Belarus, due to a significant decline in total value of agrifood exports driven by lower demand in its biggest market, the Russian Federation, went from being a net food exporter to a net importer of food.

A bright spot – trade integration

The FAO report presents information on tariffs, non-tariff trade barriers, participation in trade agreements, and ongoing trade talks.

The second half of 2015 and early 2016 saw a strengthening of integration processes in the trade of agrifood products. Kazakhstan, for example, joined the World Trade Organization (WTO). Kyrgyzstan became a member of the Eurasian Economic Union. The Deep and Comprehensive Free Trade Areas between the European Union and Ukraine, Georgia and Moldova, respectively, entered into force.

In 2017, the report suggests, an increase in the number of bilateral trade agreements being negotiated can be expected, as well as closer coordination among member countries of the Eurasian Economic Union in the area of agrifood trade policy.

Ekaterina Krivonos, FAO trade economist and co-editor of the report, emphasized that macroeconomic factors will continue playing a decisive role.

“Exchange rates and oil prices,” she said, “as well as relations between the major economies such the Russian Federation and the EU, will continue influencing directions of agrifood trade in the region.”

“Transparency of information about changes in trade policy,” she added, “contributes to stronger partnership relations between countries and the normalization of trade relations.”

www.fao.org